1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

Barnacle442
Hi, all. I have a 1981 CB750C that I am just making run again after 5 years in pieces. I have read the arguments for and against using Pods instead of the stock Airbox. I hate my airbox. I don't like the way it looks. I don't like having to screw with it to get my carbs in and out (which seems to be alot, lately). But the benefit to perfomance is definitely a plus in its favor. My question is this: if I made one big air filter pod that mounted to all four intakes like the airbox does, would there be sufficient constant vacuum across the carbs to maintain the performance? Does the size and shape of the airbox have anything to do with perfomance? I have looked but not seen anything like this air cleaner pod anywhere. Any thoughts or advice before I start using up favors would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Barnacle
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

FastCletus
I dont know how it works (ie good or bad) but I saw someone on a thread who built such a device. Although I dont rememebr where.  I think he made it out of sheet metal and rivets
@FastCletus552 aka Jimmy C, buildin' rides out of Napa CA
Current Build 1980 CB 750 F
Finished Build 1975 CB 500T Cafe Racer - SOLD
2002 Ducati 998 Biposto
2005 Rossi #46 Scooter
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

Johnnylevi
I saw a guy who made one from acrylic ( I think ). Its basically all for looks. I'd get some CR's and put pods on. They work much better. As much as the airbox is a hassle I think its worth keeping it on.
1981 SS with Kerker 4-1 exhaust and extremely attractive rider.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

sgtslag
In reply to this post by Barnacle442
My guess is that the new air box, being attached to four carbs, will pose the same issues when disconnecting it, as it will pretty much be the same thing as the OEM.  I don't see how this will be an advantage.  The vacuum will need to be roughly the same, which means the internal volume of the box will need to be identical, for the carbs to function properly (to create the same vacuum levels).

Each piston creates its own vacuum; the air box blends all four pistons' vacuum into one, average level.  With pods, each has its own, unique vacuum pattern (rises with intake stroke/falls after that), and level (constantly varying).  With one air box, each carb is subjected to a more consistent level of vacuum, all of the time, which varies with acceleration/deceleration, but they all have the same average level.  These carbs were designed for that constant, averaging vacuum level.

Change the size of the air box, and you change the vacuum/air flow levels per RPM.  I suspect you would be right back to the pod jetting issue, trying to find the 'right' jets to use.  My thoughts are that Honda engineers struggled with the carbs when they designed the engine, and they chose the happiest balance for these Constant Velocity carbs.  YMMV, of course.  Cheers!
1979 CB750K (sold, 2012, but not forgotten)
1983 Kawasaki 440 LTD Belt Drive (sold, 2011)
1993 Kawasaki Voyager XII
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

Barnacle442
In reply to this post by Barnacle442
Thanks for the input, guys! I think I'll stick with the air box, cumbersome as it is, until this becomes strictly a project bike. Then I'll experiment.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

Truck
This was in anouther thread on this site:
http://honda-cb750-s.456789.n3.nabble.com/I-GOT-PODS-TO-WORK-td4039223.html

I have pods on my 900 from the PO, he had rejetted it and the bike runs fine and I love the look and room to work in. Hope this helps you out.
It's only illegal if you get caught.

If at first you don't succeed, use more lighter fluid

95% of Harley Davidsons ever made are still on the road... The other 5% made it home.

New Baltimore, Va '82 CB900c, 1980 CB985F/K 'Mutt"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

seestheday
In reply to this post by Barnacle442
If you're going to go to that much trouble I would just mess with it until you got pods to work as well as the stock airbox or get a different set of carbs.
1981 CB750K with 900 cams
90K KM's, rebuilt head, rebuilt carbs, upgraded valve stem seals

My wife's recipe website that I'm trying to help promote: Strawberries for supper. Yes, I am a lucky man.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

Barnacle442
In reply to this post by Barnacle442
OK, so, I can't make the bike idle. I checked in the other forums for a solution. I checked the timing, set the static timing per the Chlymers 't manual cuz I can't make it idle. I checked for vacuum leaks, no leaks. I can almost get the proper idle by using the choke. All I can think is that the carbs are clogged somewhere and she's starving for fuel. So, I'm gonna pull the carbs and clean and rebuild them. All that being said, as long as the carbs are apart, when I rebuilt the bike I replaced the exhaust with a MAC 4-into-1 setup. I know I need to replace the jets but what do I go to? I'm gonna stick with the stock airbox.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

Lucky 1
In reply to this post by Barnacle442
People keep getting mixed up.

The vacuum in the carbs is created when the pistons are on their downward stroke.
So there will always be vacuum. If you do not believe that, put your hand flat over
one of the carb intakes and turn the engine over.

All the air box does is to limit the amount of air coming into the engine.
If you actually LOOK carefully at the air box you will see that it has a hole in it
that is about 1/3 the volume of all of the carb intakes total area.

Then the air filter is also a restriction.

All the air box, air filter, and exhaust do, is limit air going into and out of the engine.

Starting to get the picture.
On a Roadstar Adventure.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

Lucky 1
In reply to this post by Barnacle442
 The reason it will run with the choke on is because it is getting
less air in relationship to the gas.
It is a richer mixture.

IF you have pods and the right jet sizes and slide needle position it will run correctly.
But why not go to a DOHC forum and find out from someone
who has already done all the work for you?

On a Roadstar Adventure.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

Lucky 1
In reply to this post by sgtslag
Then why does the Honda racing team bikes use velocity stacks?
On a Roadstar Adventure.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

seestheday
I'm not sure what the year is of the racing bike you posted, but the RSC tuned DOHC honda race bikes did use velocity stacks, BUT they also heavily modified the CV carbs.  They blocked off the air cutoffs, blocked one of the two main jets, put larger single main jets in the outer two carbs and even larger main jets into the outer two carbs.

This is detailed in the RSC manuals for anyone that wants to read them.
1981 CB750K with 900 cams
90K KM's, rebuilt head, rebuilt carbs, upgraded valve stem seals

My wife's recipe website that I'm trying to help promote: Strawberries for supper. Yes, I am a lucky man.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

Barnacle442
In reply to this post by Lucky 1
I don't have pods. I am using the stock airbox. I replaced the exhaust with a 4-into-1 system. According to the Honda manual this will require re-jetting. I'm not a mechanic and I know that somebody here has to know what size jets to get for this setup or can direct me to the information I seek. Can someone here direct me or inform me so when the time comes to rebuild my carbs I can speak intelligently?

Also, the engine only produces vacuum on the intake stroke. For three strokes each cylinder produces no vacuum. The airbox is designed to distribute the vacuum from each cylider to the other three carbs while their cylinders are in the compression, power and exhaust strokes. I won't pretend to know how CV carbs work but I know a thing or two about plenums.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1981 CB750C Carbs Pods vs Airbox

Lucky 1
Plenums are used with fuel injection systems.

With carbs it is just a box to hold the air filter.
Two completely diifferent sytems.
On a Roadstar Adventure.